OPINION: Naja’atu,Tinubu and broken verses
Part of the headline of today’s intervention was inspired by a riveting
novel written by a British Pakistani author Kamila Shamsie. It was published in 2005 and titled Broken Verses. The novel in a nutshell “weaves intrigue, suspense, politics, and a mother-daughter tale into a Karachi-based [a sprawling city in Pakistan, a country of about 200 million people in population just like Nigeria] narrative, exploring universal themes of love, loss, politics, activism, feminism, hope and trauma”.
In a totally different sense, setting and era, the theme and sub plots of the issues that Shamsie explored find uncanny similarities to many of the political and quasi-political
encounters and utterances we have been
contending with in the last 10 days in the lead up to the February and March 2023 general elections in Nigeria. As in the award-winning novel Broken Verses, it was a woman who interjected herself in the raging though shameful war between Alhaji Bola Ahmed Tinubu, presidential candidate of the ruling All Progressives Congress [APC] and Alhaji Abubakar Atiku, presidential candidate of the former ruling Peoples Democratic Party [PDP], of who between them was the biggest thief angling to be elected President of Nigeria, a position that guarantees the winner unfettered access to national treasury.
Tinubu and his campaign council claimed
that on the strength of the ‘revelations’ by one Mike Achimugu, who the APC christened a ‘whistle-blower, Alhaji Atiku was a treasury looter from his days as vice president [1999-2007] and so was not eligible to contest for the presidency next month.
They gave agents of the Nigerian state 72 hours to invite or arrest and quizz Atiku preparatory to arraigning him in court. The 72 hours came and passed and
nothing happened. A senior lawyer in the
Tinubu camp, Festus Keyamo, drafted a
writ of summons to compel Atiku’s
appearance in court to answer to
allegations of graft.
Atiku and his team were incensed. They
went public. And ballistic. According to
them there are many factors that made
Alhaji Tinubu ineligible to vie for the
presidency at this time or at any other
time for that matter. They alleged that
Tinubu was an accountant to a herointrafficking syndicate in the United States of America about three decades ago. They said it was the reason that Tinubu forfeited a staggering $460,000 to the American Internal Revenue Service IRS].
Their argument was that if no crime was
involved, why forfeit that huge amount of money. Not done the Atiku campaign
went further to insinuate that the APC
candidate could still be involved in the
global illicit trade on drugs. They asked him to explain how, as recent as 2015, millions of dollars, [four million or so], was wired abroad from a company that Tinubu has been associated with which ultimate destination was a bank account in a country in Latin America notorious for drug trafficking. The Atiku team followed up with further allegation that Tinubu even visited that country soon after the money was wired. They also invited investigation agencies to go after Tinubu or they will head to court.
That was where we were when a self acclaimed activist Hajia Naja’atu Bala Mohammed, who is a widow of an activist
Bala Mohammed, inserted herself into thenational drama of the absurd of who
between Alhaji Atiku and Alhaji Tinubu
was the alleged biggest thief to bestride the Nigerian political space. The curious thing is that none of the ‘accused’ has made a full-throated denial that each had or still has a pipeline running from government coffers to their personal or corporate bank accounts or to the bank accounts of their proxies. But they have succeeded in giving Special Purpose Vehicle [SPV], an otherwise legitimate corporate tool and process, a bad name.
In truth, virtually everything that Atiku and Tinubu have accused themselves of have been in the public domain for years and decades. The only thing that is shocking, but not really shocking because this is Nigeria, is that they have the criminal courage to look us in face, damn us and present themselves as presidential candidates of two major parties. They expect us to vote for them. And why not.
They have many supporters from amongst
us. They have people and professionals in their respective campaign councils who, not long ago, called them unprintable names. As it is in the APC, so it is in the PDP. Those charlatans also canvass us to vote as president the very persons they had recently described as criminals, looters of public treasuries, religious bigots, document forgers and tribal warlords. Nollywood actor Kenneth Okonkwo, a lawyer, of the Living in Bondage fame has since captured the accusations between Atiku and Tinubu in succinct terms when he said that every unflattering things Atiku said about Tinubu were correct and that every accusations levied by Tinubu on Atiku were undeniable but that everything that PDP said aboutthemselves were lies and that everything APC said about themselves were fabricated.
Back to Naja’atu inserting herself in the shameful even if true accusations of
criminality hurled at each other by Atiku and Tinubu. Naja’atu is widely reputed to speak her mind. She is the widow of an activist. She was a students union president at the Ahmadu Bello University [ABU] in Kaduna at a time it was rare for a female to aspire to such position. She recently reportedly called for the police to arrest and quiz Aisha Buhari, wife of the President, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, who was said to have caused a university student to be arrested for criticizing her on social media. At the time of her call
Naja’atu was a member of the Nigeria
Police Service Commission, a position she holds at the instance of the ruling APC and at the pleasure of Gen. Buhari, husband of Aisha.
Less than two weeks ago, flame thrower
Naja’atu stirred the political hornets nest. She suddenly resigned her membership of the APC’s Tinubu/Shettima presidential campaign council. She was chair of the civil society group. But she would not go quietly. She alleged that Tinubu was not physically, mentally and clinically fit to be the President of Nigeria. She claimed that from a personal encounter, Tinubu cannot
hold a teacup and cannot engage in
meaningful conversations. Naja’atu said
her conscience would not allow her to
work to make such a man President of a
country that is in dire straits. She is also known to have said on public television to a global audience that Buhari, who she claimed to have helped to win the presidency in 2015, had been an unmitigated disaster who has failed to keep any of the promises he made to
Nigerians. She branded Buhari an
extremely selfish person who only cared
On Naja’atu we will interrogate her
bonafide as an activist, her allusion to her conscience while resigning from the
Tinubu team, her comments about the
leading presidential candidates and the
choice she had made thereafter. She has
since thrown her lot with Atiku, a fellow northerner to succeed another northerner as Nigeria’s President next May if he wins. She said she would not have problem supporting Alhaji Rabiu Kwankwaso of the New Nigeria Peoples Party [NNPP] if his path to the presidency was not extremely narrow. For Peter Obi, presidential candidate of the Labour Party, she said one major thing she holds against him was that he had failed to condemn and disown the Indigenous People of Biafra [IPOB].
But an activist should be even-handed and a person with conscience, as she claims she has, and so should set a store on equity. Naja’atu fails woefully on the critical scores. She backed Buhari in 2015 as she claimed and helped to bring him to power.
Read also:OPINION: How do you shame the shameless?
There was no record of Buhari condemning Boko Haram before the
elections in 2015. Indeed, there was
record of Buhari as a presidential aspirant and later candidate saying that any attack on Boko Haram by the President Goodluck Jonathan-led federal government was an attack on the north. So Buhari embraced and cuddled the murderous and sectarian Boko Haram and yet ‘activist’ and ‘conscientious’ Naja’atu supported him. Obi is not known to have publicly or privately supported IPOB. Instead Obi is on record to have said that the carrot and stick approach will be used on agitators in
any part of the country when he becomes
Naja’atu has a seared conscience and I will explain. She supports Atiku and that’s within her rights. She should not be begrudged. But the candidate she now
supports has severally been accused of
being corrupt. Your activist’s credentials are tainted and your conscience is of doubtful value if you support a candidate for a very high office with such a huge moral burden. It will be futile attempting to hide behind one finger by claiming that he was yet to be convicted by a court of law.
In politics perception is virtually
everything. Even more damning is the fact that Alhaji Atiku Abubakar is not known to have condemned Boko Haram or its cousin that also operates in Nigeria- the Fulani Militia- one of the top three most vicious terrorist organizations according to the Global Terrorism Index. To cap it up, the same Atiku deleted a tweet in his name condemning the gruesome murder of Deborah Samuel in Sokoto last year by
her so-called fellow students who were
actually Islamist terrorists. The state has brazenly given the murderers full cover and immunity. That action, among others exposed who Atiku is. And Naja’atu in spite of herself cannot be different from the person she supports. Enough of Naja’atu claiming who she is not.
AUTHOR: Ugo onuoha
Articles published in our Graffiti section are strictly the opinion of the writers and do not represent the views of Ripples Nigeria or its editorial stand.
Join the conversation
Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism
Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.
As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.
If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.
Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.